View Single Post
Old 07-28-16, 03:32 AM
  #8  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,448

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3147 Post(s)
Liked 1,712 Times in 1,034 Posts
Originally Posted by brawlo
Well, I've been down that path way back. I was using a StarTrac Vbike when I got into cycling. Short story, the resistance just isn't the same. The best use of a trainer is intervals. It just makes the time more economic and less boring by being able to do a shorter workout. I now have my original road bike permanently sitting in a Kurt Kinetic Road Machine. I use it mainly for sprint track based efforts.

For the money, a trainer with your bike in it will be much more useful. I would rate the KKRM as one of the most economical of the power based trainers due to its proven reliability and correlation to road output. You can function just fine with their graph and a speedo for power output or you could pay the little extra and get the add on sensor to display the output details on an apple device.
Kurt Kinetic are almost out of the game. They don't even have a smart unit yet, and the one they're coming out with isn't ANT+ FEC controllable. You can get a better trainer that does more for almost half the price. Kurt is too little, too late, and the success of Zwift they'll never compete with on their own proprietary system. They're way behind the curve now, but in '17, they'll be totally irrelevant.
chaadster is offline