View Single Post
Old 08-04-16 | 02:08 PM
  #18  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
Carbonfiberboy
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,583
Likes: 2,690
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
Couldn't be either, because:

(1) If you're lifting weights (on a progressive resistance plan) and eating enough protein (1g per day per pound of lean mass - that's a lot) and enough carbs and eating a calorie surplus and have the testosterone of a 20 to 30 year old man, you'll build up to 1/2 pound of muscle per week.

(2) That doesn't happen. All throughout history, when prisoners of war aren't given enough to eat, they always lose weight as a result. Starvation mode is a popular diet myth, but it's a myth. It's true that as you lose weight, you need fewer calories to maintain fewer pounds. But that's a different thing than saying your body just prefers having extra weight and will maintain it without resources.
Yes and no. It is true that calorie reduction can cause a slowing of the metabolic rate. The mechanism for that seems to be a decreased activity level which naturally happens during calorie restriction. However if activity level is maintained, as in the OP, then the metabolic rate does not slow:
when people significantly reduce their calorie intake, they undergo a metabolic adaptation that results in a slower metabolic rate. The slower metabolic rate results in a behavioral adaptation in which individuals become less physically active.
https://www.nia.nih.gov/newsroom/ann...ie-restriction
__________________
Results matter

Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply