View Single Post
Old 08-07-16 | 06:46 AM
  #37  
bruce19's Avatar
bruce19
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,158
Likes: 1,743
From: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT

Bikes: Canyon Aeroad, CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX, Guru steel & Guru Photon

Originally Posted by Machka
Marginally. But if your goal is to lose weight, put your goal weight into the calculations.





42 miles? Using the 100 cal/5 km calculation, that's 1352 cal. That's what I would go with.

Strava appears to use speed. So if your average speed on this ride was, say, 18 km/h because of the climbing, Strava figures you haven't worked as hard as if you did a ride at, say, 22 km/h on a flatter ride.

But if you're trying to lose weight, just go with a lowish number of calories burned. Going low makes up for an extra calories you might have consumed.
I must be missing something. You're saying I should use 100 cal/5 km regardless of speed or elevation data?
bruce19 is offline  
Reply