View Single Post
Old 08-07-16 | 09:04 PM
  #48  
wphamilton's Avatar
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,278
Likes: 342
From: Alpharetta, GA

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Originally Posted by sprince
The assumption that it is all about metabolic efficiency is yet another generality that fails.
How so? I'm interested in why the energy used climbing (additional to the bike ride if it were flat) is about more than mgh and metabolic efficiency.

I think that this description is precisely correct, not a generality at all, but I've been wrong now and again. So seriously, what's your reasoning here?

Last edited by wphamilton; 08-07-16 at 09:11 PM.
wphamilton is offline  
Reply