View Single Post
Old 08-11-16 | 06:13 PM
  #16  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Originally Posted by Andy_K
Now back on topic, I've got an '82 Trek 614. I'm using 27 inch wheels on mine and it still requires longer reach from the brakes than you get from most brakes from the big three component makers these days. Standard brakes now max out at 49mm of reach. I'm using Tektro R539s on my Trek with 27 inch wheels. These brakes have a range of 47-57mm reach and I think I'm about in the middle of that range. With 700c wheels I'd be at the end and I might even need the longer reach R559's.

The 700 and 900 series Treks from that year were sold with 700c wheels, but if you've got 27 inch wheels now you probably have a 400, 500 or 600 series frame and so I would guess that you're brake reach issues would be comparable to mine. As I noted above, there are good brakes available that will make this conversion work for you, but you'll need to look for them. The other thing you should be aware of is that you probably need nutted brakes (as opposed to recessed) or you will need to have your frame drilled out for recessed brakes. I recommend looking for nutted brakes since that is an option for the brakes with the reach you need anyway.
Excellent points. I have an '83 Trek 400, bought used, that I updated to 700c wheels several years ago. It came with "long reach" (47 - 57 mm) Shimano 105 dp brakes (added by the previous owner) that had enough adjustment to align with the new rims. These were nutted brakes so no drilling was needed but I have drilled out other frames to use recessed nut brakes that originally required external nut mounts.
HillRider is offline  
Reply