View Single Post
Old 08-16-16 | 12:43 PM
  #27  
1nterceptor's Avatar
1nterceptor
LET'S ROLL
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 59
From: NEW YORK, NY - USA

Bikes: 2014 BMC Gran Fondo, 2013 Brompton S6L-X

I bought the newer Hotshot Micro because even though it used the same 2watt LED as the original Hotshot;
the new optics made the beam wider/more intense:

Cygolite Micro(l)- Original Hotshot(r) by 1nterceptor, on Flickr

Cygolite Micro(l)-Original Hotshot(r) Facing by 1nterceptor, on Flickr

Hotshot Micro(l) - Cygolite Original(r)Wall by 1nterceptor, on Flickr

I also got the Pro 80; but don't have the original Hotshot anymore for a comparison.

Originally Posted by Biker395
FYI, some of the newer Cygolite tail lights have a wider beam than before. According to their website (with regard to the Hotshot Pro 80):

"Extra wide beam Enhanced Cycling Optics efficiently scatters the beam to maximize your visual presence."

I have the Hotshot Pro 80, and the beam really is quite a bit broader than before and much broader than the Planet Bike tail light it replaced. I dunno why they don't spec out how broad for comparison purposes with other lights ... they should.

I'd also say this ... having a broader beam in the horizontal direction is great, but having a broader beam in the vertical direction is something to avoid. That was brought home to me last weekend, as I rode behind my buddy with his Cygolite Hotshot 50. When properly aimed, the beam was reasonable when I was immediately behind him, but if I was 50 feet or so behind him, it was near blinding. A light without that narrower vertical beamwidth characteristic would be problematic for people riding in groups.
1nterceptor is offline  
Reply