Thread: Landrider
View Single Post
Old 08-30-16 | 04:02 PM
  #57  
yonime
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Dan Burkhart
I do not mean to get personal. When someone with a post count of one or two shows up to endorse a product, whether in a new thread, or a zombie thread like this one, it pins the needle on my shill dectector.
Just read back through this thread, starting with the single poster OP, and tell me those suspicions are not justified.
I note, however, that you did not directly address my acusation, so apology witheld for now.
I am not an anomymous internet sniper. The name you see in the left column is an abrieviation of what appears on my driver's license.
If you tell me you are not a shill, are not affilliated with Landrider, and have not posted on this previously under a different name, I will take you at you word, and I WILL apologize.
My characterization of the Landrider stands however. The basic design is sound, and the freewheeling chainwheel and fixed cassette are an ingenious way to make the mechanism work to downshift while coasting.
The issues are, too many wear points, and not enough adjustments to compensate for wear.
And the big one, too many proprietary parts that are unobtainable when replacement is indicated.
Glad you enjoy your bike.
And yet I've had mine almost 15 years with only normal maintenance. Right now it needs a new chain. The idler belt or whatever you'd call it is still in good shape. Sorry I got my back up, but reading others comments on a bike they've never owned or ridden will get to you. Back to you - if there are too many wear points A) how would you know not having owned one? B Why haven't they made themselves known on my bike?
yonime is offline