Originally Posted by
bw00ds
I've read the thread "double pannier, single pannier, or trunk" with great interest. However, I would like to get discussion about using a backpack vs. any of them. What are the pros and cons? Should I just go with a pannier(s) or a trunk?
Pros for backpack over other options (that I can think of):
- Can carry a ton of stuff
- Has lots of compartments for stuff
- Easily portable when finished with ride
- I already have and am using a backpack, therefore I could theoretically save the money I would spend on a pannier/trunk system
- Is waterproof when I put on my rain slick over it
Cons for backpacks:
- Makes my back hot and sweaty on a ride to work
- Wondering if a loaded backpack contributes to achy lower back during the ride
- Has me carrying the weight instead of hauling it on the bike
What do you think? Should I just stick with a backpack? If you switched from a backpack to a different gear hauling system, why did you and why is it better/not better for you now?
Thanks!
Brad
Most of the pros for backpack are for the specific bag - some trunk bags and panniers can fit a ton of stuff, have lots of pockets and are easily portable. The
Nashbar Euro ones I've got have two small outside pockets for stuff like building pass, lock, etc, and have a hide-away rain cover. $29.99 for the pair of them.
I also have a second set of bags (voyager?), a trunk bag ($5 on kijiji) and a nashbar garment bag (probably would go for the two wheel gear version if I were to do it over again, but it's a lot more expensive)
BTW, I use a backpack to carry most of the same stuff when I run to work instead of biking, and when I ride a bike I don't have a rack on. No big issues with pain or carrying the weight, but I enjoy my ride more with panniers/trunk bag. Especially in sweat weather.