Originally Posted by CB HI

My objection is politicians telling lies on funding grants that a facility is for transportational purposes to get the money, then spending it on a recreational facility. Then they tell cyclist they can only travel at 10 mph on the supposed transportational facility or the try to ban cyclist altogether.

I find that repaved roads with wide outside lanes to be outstanding cycling facilities honestly built with transportational funds for transportation purposes.


Maybe funding appropriated for bike lanes should be spent on surf racks. I am sure no cyclist would be upset by that.