View Single Post
Old 10-30-16 | 06:02 PM
  #18  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Originally Posted by CliffordK
If the law requires you to have pedal reflectors.

Then should pedals without reflectors be sold?

But, I think shoe reflectors would naturally be better than pedal reflectors in many cases, so, perhaps either flat pedals with reflectors, or cycling shoes with reflectors and clipless pedals without reflectors.

I'm not sure there are any negatives of tire reflectors. A gram or two of weight?

There is an overlap between racing equipment and non-racing equipment. But, if 100% of the racers were required to use minimal safety equipment, then there would be little benefit of non-reflector tires.
There's the question -- are we talking about the law when it comes to selling bikes, or riding bikes? The laws for selling bikes are pretty straightforward. They come with front/rear reflectors and pedal reflectors, unless there are special allowances for high-performance bikes I don't know about. Many high-performance bicycles are never ridden at night anyway. What races do you have in mind where reflectors and lights would be remotely necessary?
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply