View Single Post
Old 11-07-16 | 10:49 PM
  #4193  
spectastic
commu*ist spy
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,462
Likes: 5
From: oregon
Originally Posted by tetonrider
yes.

have you ever done A/B comparisons of multiple stems with everything else constant? or multiple bars?

for me, doing actual testing made some things clear that previously i might not have felt mattered. what was eye-opening to me years ago was when i had a bar/stem setup where i thought the bars might not be stiff, so i swapped them out for something definitely stiffer. the exercise actually made me realize that the stem was a weak link, despite others saying that model was 'plenty stiff.'

ymmv, of course, and perhaps you might not be sensitive to changes if you have tested them or might not care. however, to suggest that others cannot tell the difference because there is too much else that is going on in the system is not fair.
Originally Posted by hack
Likewise. Compared bars and stems and I could tell a difference. It was more evident in bars than the stem to me. I've ended up using Pro Vibe 7s bars as a reasonable compromise between cost, stiffness, and weight. Haven't tried their Cavendish/Sprint model, but suspect they're rather rigid.
I suppose i never did direct comparisons where i go back to back using the same setup. I've always just hopped off one back and onto another. how much difference is there? I've been using fsa omega compact, and just ordered fsa gossamer compact (different width) for my racing bike next season. do you guys know these to be decent, or not so good? I can't seem to find much data on them.
spectastic is offline  
Reply