View Single Post
Old 11-22-16 | 05:31 PM
  #22  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by RubeRad
No, I mean converting cycling X foot rise over Y miles to climbing A flights of stairs in B minutes
Oh, that's much more simple. For short term purposes, ie hills that take less than 5-10 minutes to climb, distance doesn't matter so much. It becomes almost purely a question of total height gained.

Assuming you have adequate gearing, climbing 200' in half a mile at 8% or a mile at 4% in roughly the same amount of time takes comparable effort. This is something that many who have multiple choices to climb the same ridge or hill discover soon enough.

The "only altitude counts" concept breaks down when hills are longer because the time element becomes a factor in its own right.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply