View Single Post
Old 12-06-16 | 02:27 PM
  #39  
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
PatrickGSR94
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 13
From: Memphis TN area

Bikes: 2011 Felt Z85 (road/commuter), 2006 Marin Pine Mountain (utility/commuter E-bike), 1995 KHS Alite 1000 (gravel grinder)

Originally Posted by kingston
While I would describe it differently, that's exactly why it's irrelevant.
It's totally relevant. Everyone wants to get to their destination hassle-free. That's why right-of-way laws exist. Without them it would be chaos on the roads. With right-of-way laws, traffic moves relatively normally. When someone violates that right of way, someone else generally has to make a corrective action, or take evasive action, or there's a crash. It's the same whether you're in a car or on a bike. If there's only corrective action, like slowing down a bit, or making a slight course change, it's a non-event for both cyclists and motorists alike. If evasive action is required, it can be stressful and annoying, for both cyclists and motorists. And if there's a crash things get even worse, generally more so for a cyclist.

I'm not sure why you try to downplay right-of-way laws for cyclists. They apply the same to all traffic, all vehicles, all vehicle operators, and it's why generally, for the most part, the roads are not filled with chaos and anarchy.
PatrickGSR94 is offline  
Reply