Originally Posted by
DrIsotope
I've never had Strava give me an inflated elevation number, ever. This just means I'm going to get boned on elevation gain even more than I have in the past. For while the Garmins I've owned have been consistent, they also read consistently low-- I've done a climb into the local mountains half a dozen times, and know the listed elevations for both the start and the finish: 1,320ft at my house, and 6,140ft for the end point. That's 4,820 feet of absolute veritcal, if the road just constantly climbed from point A to point B. It of course does not, and there are several dips and drops along the way. Strava has never given me more than 4,600 feet on any trip. If I were to use altitude correction, it would likely chop off another couple hundred. But hey, Strava already rounds everything down except calories, so we shouldn't be at all surprised.
I'm also from South Cal. I've been using Garmin 800.
1. Palos Verdes Areas: mostly no strava inflation. 10-20% inflation on the ~800 ft Via Coronel climb. ~20% percent inflation on the "Big One". ~30% inflation on Ganado.
2. Hwy 39 from foothill to Crystal Lake: Strava algorithm would inflate 4500 ft to ~6500 ft.
3. GMR ~20% inflation
4. However, GMR-GRR-Baldy Ski Lift: very little inflation
5. Newport Coast, Pelican Hills, Ridge Park: 30 - 40% inflation
6. Santiago Canyon Rd from West to East, ~20-30% inflation, from East to West, not as much..
..........