View Single Post
Old 01-04-17 | 11:07 PM
  #35  
Barnabas88
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Queensland

Bikes: Demountable MTB

Airline baggage requirements

Originally Posted by Tourist in MSN
I know a guy that always wants to show off that he is the genuine expert on the latest and greatest bike technology. He said a year ago that Trek quit using 559mm for mountain bikes. He was bragging about how great 584mm was, but I shut him up when I said that I could not buy any new 584mm tires back in the late 70s at any of the local shops which put one of my 60s vintage bikes in storage. He had no idea that 584mm was an old size that is being pushed again by the marketers as something new.

Some 700c bikes are sold with couplers. A Co-Motion Americano owner I talked to several years ago said that the 700c wheel was too big to fit in the case flat but that it did fit with a slight angle. I think he removed the tires first.

I would not be surprised if there are a bunch of new 584mm bikes sold with couplers in a few years.

But the big danger that I am more worried about is if the airlines switch to a smaller size criteria than 62 inch. I think it was a year or two ago that some European airlines were pushing a new smaller size standard for carryons that would exclude virtually all of the ones currently sold, but too much consumer outrage stopped their attempts at that time.
I do prefer my 700 wheeled bike for touring but I kept coming back to the airline baggage dimension. A 26" x 26" x 10" soft case seems to meet airline criteria and the 26" wheels of my demountable bike. I would be interested in how others get under the radar with larger wheeled bikes.
Barnabas88 is offline  
Reply