Thread: Decal ethics...
View Single Post
Old 01-06-17 | 02:57 PM
  #23  
DIMcyclist
No longer active
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by noglider
Sorry if I sound snippy. I'm having a horrific day.
Sorry to hear you're having terrible day, Tom; I hope it gets better.

Originally Posted by Lascauxcaveman
Your hypothetical Modelo A and Modelo B are certainly a grey area. And some here would take you to task for it, endlessly debating the degrees of fraud you are committing by foisting off your POS Modleo B for the much more desirable (and valuable!) Modelo A.
Actually, if you read the initial post, the parameters of this little thought experiment posit that the Modelo A & Modelo B are the same, aside from dropout spacing & decals; that's to say there is no implied difference in the quality of the frame or its materials, only that our hypothetical Modelo B is a tad newer by, let's say- a year or so.

Edit: Just to clarify, I've personally been one to err on the side of history, or at least stick to original designs as closely as possible (color notwithstanding; I'm a pro designer, and tend to have ideas along those lines). Fwiw, I was kinda prompted to this little ethical exploration by my Pinarello Asolo. It's a terrific ride & in excellent condition (full Campy Daytona, btw); however, at some point in the past, it has received new decals. The paint seems to be original, similar to other Pianrellos of its era, but apparently the original brand markings flaked off at some point (old Pinarello decals are kinda notorious for that). The current decals are correct to the period, but they did prompt my curiosity.

Last edited by DIMcyclist; 01-06-17 at 03:22 PM. Reason: Additional info.
DIMcyclist is offline