View Single Post
Old 01-16-17 | 12:58 PM
  #17  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,760
Likes: 2,118
From: Madison, WI

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Originally Posted by jefnvk
Hmm. It seems to me that you would want to vary the length for different sized bikes, to keep everything proportional. Then again, I'm no bike builder!
Fully concur.

But most bike manufacturers cut a lot of corners if they can save a few bucks. And if standardizing chainstay length on all sizes of a model will cut a few bucks they do it. Same with tubing diameter and tubing gauges, most manufacturers will use the same tubing on all sizes within a model, that way the 250 pound big guy has a wet noodle for a frame while a small framed woman has a really stiff frame.

I took another look at the sales brochures from when I bought my two Thorns. On my Sherpa they used two different tubing sets and four different chainstay lengths for different sizes. On my Nomad they had two different tubing sets, but they actually overlapped for two sizes so for those two sizes you could buy the lighter weight tubing or the heavier tubing. My size was one of the two where they overlapped, so I could buy a frame with a capacity of 45kg without rider weight or 62kg capacity. Both of those weight ratings far exceed any load that I will ever want to carry, but I bought the heavier weight tubing to get a stronger bike. For the other sizes, they only had one choice of tubing, lighter for the smaller frames and heavier for the bigger frames. And the Nomad had five different chainstay lengths for their different sizes.

I am sure that there are other manufacturers that also use different tubing on different sizes for off the shelf frames but I really have no idea who they would be. But I am sure you are looking at the more expensive manufacturers for that.
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Reply