Originally Posted by HTupolev

1-They compounded statements in very sketchy ways. The cut from "we can gain X strength efficiency" to "we can gain X strength efficiency while also gaining in aero forming" was made through a very vague logical leap, for instance.
2-It wouldn't be a 300g bike. It would be a 300g bike frame. The actual difference this would make in the grand scheme of things is pretty small.


False analogy. Graphene, or carbon fibers, by themselves are not things that bike frames are made out of. And single measures are rarely useful descriptors of applicability.


It's worth looking into, but won't totally turn the world of cycling on its head.