Old 03-11-17 | 02:04 PM
  #17  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by dagray
so if you have a shorter chain the power is more effectively transferred to the wheel as there are less links to absorb the power. the distance from the front chainring to the rear cassette on the Orbea is much shorter (like four inches) than the Raleigh. This allows more torque due to less links to absorb the energy output from the pedaling.

Sort of like a car transmission in a manual when the clutch is starting to slip you lose energy, but when one installs a heavy duty clutch it grabs instantaneously and there is much less power loss.

A shorter drive train equates to more power being transferred to the back wheel.

Sorry, I thought you were thinking along these lines but thought I should give you a chance yo explain what you had in mind before saying it was 100% wrong.

To use your clutch analogy, the chain, regard of it' length engage solidly, and 100% of the tension applied to one end, is delivered to the other.

I don't want to hijack this thread debating this, but thought I'd spare those concerned with the OP, the distraction of misinformation.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply