View Single Post
Old 03-24-17 | 10:26 PM
  #30  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,079
Likes: 6,099
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by mstateglfr
Yes touring bikes typically handle better with a front load in that it stabilizes steering which means slower and steadier.
Compared to rear only which makes the bike rear heavy.
The way I like to describe it is that the tail wags the dog with heavy rear panniers. Death wobbles and frightening downhills are much more common with a heavy rear load than with a heavier front load. 60% front/40% rear has been a sweet spot in my experience. I have no problems with 50 mph downhills on loaded bikes.

It's been 40 years since I've ridden a bike with a rear only load on a mountain downhill and the experience left such a lasting impression that I won't repeat it.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply