View Single Post
Old 05-01-17 | 05:49 PM
  #17  
kickstart's Avatar
kickstart
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 5,331
Likes: 12
From: Kent Wa.

Bikes: 2005 Gazelle Golfo, 1935 Raleigh Sport, 1970 Robin Hood sport, 1974 Schwinn Continental, 1984 Ross MTB/porteur, 2013 Flying Piegon path racer, 2014 Gazelle Toer Populair T8

Robert, Growing up in the 70's and seeing the moped boom and bust, I think there's several important differences between mopeds and e-bikes.

Mopeds were noisy, smelly, and dirty (even more so after we had our way with them). E-bikes are silent, clean, and green.

Mopeds were primarily used by pre driving age teens, and students when a car wasn't an option. E-bikes are primarily used by adults who consciously choose them in place of a car, or low impact recreational riding and exercise.

Mopeds were significantly faster and more powerful than off the shelf, legal e-bikes. E-bikes that match a mopeds capabilities are limited to DIY builds.

Mopeds were relatively inexpensive compared to available options. E-bikes are expensive, and quickly enter the price range of used, and new motorcycles.

Mopeds had virtually effortless extreme range capabilities at 100 to 150 mpg. E-bike range is limited, and requires forethought for longer trips.

Mopeds were grudgingly tolerated by the legal establishment at best and quickly lost favor. E-bikes outside of a few places are accepted and welcome, and are gaining favor with the legal establishment to the point of being promoted as green transportation in some locations.

I'm not too concerned with the ES crowd, they're a small group of tinkerers that spend a lot of time, effort, and money to make high power e-bikes that in reality have the capabilities of a modest scooter.

I do agree there should be regulations, and that California got it right, and that it should be the universal standard for the US.

Last edited by kickstart; 05-01-17 at 05:53 PM.
kickstart is offline  
Reply