View Single Post
Old 05-04-17 | 12:03 AM
  #9  
maddog34's Avatar
maddog34
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 7,431
Likes: 3,261
From: NW Oregon

Bikes: 1982 Trek 930R Custom, '91 Diamondback Ascent w/ XT, XTR updates, Fuji Team Pro CF road flyer, Specialized Sirrus Gravel Convert, '09 Comencal Meta 5.5 XC, '02 Marin MBX500, '84 Gitane Criterium bike

Originally Posted by corrado33
Shifting to a SMALLER cog would be going AWAY from the spokes.
second hand account, and sometimes people say "smaller cog" when they actually shift to a LARGER rear gear.... I've heard that many, many times... and quite frankly, the damage level talked about could only come from the der. getting snagged in the spokes, or an overshift/tangle( i hate it when that happens)... and then, there's that earlier wreck to consider... bent der. hanger would be a result of the wreck, perhaps...

and since rider claimed to have been in the middle chain ring, with no reference to whether the front, or rear der. was shifted from the OP author, my assumption was of improper terminology as to the gear change......

more info, from the rider, is needed? Or a good inspection in person, which is not an option on these forums, eh?

and to the OP... i'd be looking at the spokes BEHIND the rear der...... overshifts cause hidden spoke damage that may only be visible once the cassette is removed... and inspect the frame for overshift off the small side, too.... once again... more info is needed.

Last edited by maddog34; 05-04-17 at 12:17 AM.
maddog34 is online now  
Reply