Originally Posted by
kickstart
LCF doesn't have to be us against them regardless of who you identify with.
Just because LCF isn't viable or desirable for everyone, It doesn't mean it's invalid or unworthy of accommodation. On the same token, those who need or choose to drive aren't a problem that needs to be solved in of it's self.
If both sides would quit passing judgment on, and fretting that the other is somehow taking advantage, maybe something positive could happen.
Its ridiculous to suggest the only answer is to choose between doing nothing to improve how we live, or resorting to harebrained utopian schemes.
Empathy, and respect.
Sounds reasonable and anyone on Bike Forums outside of the LCF politicos love bikes and the sport of cycling so ostensibly most everyone shares something in common and can be expected to get along. However, underlying the LCF movement is the dogmatic belief that individual ownership of a car is destroying the globe. It's all pretty hypocritical because a New Yorker who takes a cab gets a pass-- makes no sense. If you like the open spaces, LEF (Living Elevator Free) makes more sense than LCF.