Old 05-07-17 | 09:36 PM
  #12  
79pmooney's Avatar
79pmooney
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,138
Likes: 5,256
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Bigger rings and cogs are more efficient and last longer. That said, I usually choose mine for other reasons. My good fix gear uses all 1/8" track gear. I am limited to 144BCD chainrings. I also do a lot of hill climbing on that bike, so I use as small a ring as practicable - 42 teeth. (41s do exist, at least in 3/32". I've been hearing about them for 40 years. Campagnolo made them, but not a lot. Given how rare they are, I see litlle point in looking for one. I did however pick up a 43, also Campy but in blue anodizing for the BMX market.

REDMASTA, the number of skip patches is a function of the gear ratio, not the ring and cog sizes, For example, 36-12, 39-13, 42-14, and 45-15 all have 3 skid patches. (And all are 81 gear inches.) If you have to have say an 81" gear and you cannot deal with 3 skip patches, you could use a bike with a different size wheel. (Say a 26" wheel with a 44-15.) Or you could use brakes.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply