View Single Post
Old 05-27-17, 04:56 PM
  #8  
tagaproject6
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 145 Posts
Originally Posted by VegasTriker
I wouldn't recommend a recumbent bike for riding if loss of balance is a problem. The idea that you are closer to the ground so will not get hurt as badly is bogus too. I've crashed on mine and watched other recumbent riders do the same. Yes, you generally crash to the side instead of going over the handlebars but you can get seriously hurt on a recumbent just like a regular bike. If you happen to fall into the path of traffic the recumbent makes no difference. Those of us who mostly ride trikes are really closer to the ground and much less likely to crash if we were to experience a dizzy spell. There is also the problem of cost. It turns off most people who express an interest. A guy was looking over my Catrike 700 this morning as I got back on it and when he asked about the cost, there was an instant loss of interest following my answer.

Edit: Saw your reply as I was composing this. Ever tried one or are you just opinionated?
Sorry for veering off..saw a Catrike in Southwest bikes last weekend...I WANT ONE!
tagaproject6 is offline