Thread: 700x28 vs 32
View Single Post
Old 06-01-17, 03:34 PM
  #6  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,269
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1979 Post(s)
Liked 1,298 Times in 630 Posts
Originally Posted by Marcus_Ti
...a 14% change in width represents a 30% change in cross-sectional area and a similarly large difference in volume....not really small.
Yes, but I don't see how that's significant, outside of marketers trying to make the effects of increased tire width sound more significant than they are by expressing things in terms of some value that happens to grow quadratically.

Doubling the width gives you four times the volume, but for the most part, most of what appear to be the relevant consequences change by a factor of two. The amount of tire distortion for a given linear deflection is halved. The amount of travel you have before the tire bottoms out is halved. Once PSI is adjusted per width, the amount of air that goes into the tire is only roughly doubled. And so on.

What consequences quadruple as a result of the volume's quadrupling?
HTupolev is offline