Old 06-10-17 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
Maelochs's Avatar
Maelochs
Senior Member
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,917
Likes: 3,944

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Originally Posted by fietsbob
I dial in on top tube length, myself..., seat tube length , aka frame size , varies.. .
seat post exposure is based on personal esthetics and on tradition. What matters when it comes to Riding the bike (as opposed to how strangers see it) is where the rider's weight is and how it is supported, and how well s/he can use the controls.

Not to say esthetics aren't---or can't be---important.

But ... I was watching the Dauphine today, looking at those guys climb Alpe d'Huez. They look so right in their flat-back riding positions ... to me a person on a racing bike just looks right, the way a Lamborghini Miura or old Ford Mustang--or a P-51 Mustang --just looks right.

I also realize that I will Never "look right" no matter what.

I would need to lose 60 or 80 pounds, and dramatically increase my strength and flexibility--and being at work like 70 hours per week, I don't see that fitting into my schedule.

So ... as good as the slammed stem and flat back may look, it is not an esthetic I can aspire to.

So ... who cares anyway? Nobody is looking.

This guy has found a bike that fits like a glove. That is the whole premise of his post. Who is even looking at him to judge him? Just us. Even the people he rides past won't give him more than a cursory glance, likely. They are too busy with their phones.

This guy has found the Holy Grail--a bike that is comfortable to ride as far and long as he wants.

If he also wants to spend some money on artwork, great ... but I think that might best be discussed on a different forum (unless he hangs bicycle frames or other parts on his walls.)
Maelochs is offline  
Reply