Old 06-30-17 | 10:29 AM
  #19  
70sSanO's Avatar
70sSanO
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 6,006
Likes: 2,286
From: Mission Viejo

Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970

Originally Posted by asmac
Around the city, I settle mostly in the middle chainring and do most shifting at the rear. Whether or not that actually matters I have no idea and I'm not too concerned about a 'perfect' chainline or maximum efficiency.
This was my point. People don't ride on an efficiency graph. Even you won't adhere to it. In the real world people shift to their ability and terrain. Some people like half step but most people, IMO, with a triple will ride in the middle for rollers & city, big for wide ops flats, and small for climbing.

I run a 2x on my mountain bikes. 24 is for climbing or if I'm not sure of the terrain, 34 for descents and flats. Since I'm only running 7 speeds, spaced closer together at 8, I can easily hit all cogs with either chainring. It is imperative for me at my age to make sure I'm not caught in the 34 with a sudden terrain change. While not as critical on my road bike I try to select a chainring for a ride section and I don't constantly toggle between chainrings, unless I suddenly have to dump to the granny unexpectedly.

John
70sSanO is offline  
Reply