Old 07-11-17, 09:57 PM
  #69  
f4rrest
Farmer tan
 
f4rrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 7,986

Bikes: Allez, SuperSix Evo

Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2870 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Ninety5rpm
it has everything to do with the motorist's behavior in reaction to the two positions.

A motorist who is approaching an edge cyclist typically does not alter speed or position regardless of whether the edge cyclist is seen. So an edge cyclist with a mirror can't discern between the two motorists - both are behaving the same in terms of speed and trajectory even though one is alert and the other is inattentive and about to drift into the cyclist.

A motorist who is approaching a cyclist in the lane most does alter speed or position (if not both) in reaction to the presence of the cyclist up ahead in his path. So this cyclist with a mirror CAN discern between the two motorists -should one be so inattentive as to not notice a cyclist directly in his path he will be be blatantly obvious (neither slowing nor changing his trajectory). Or, in this case, where the motorist want's to teach the cyclist a lesson, his trajectory will be towards a buzz pass or actual contact rather than one headed for safe pass.

Spend some time with a mirror and experimenting with lane positioning and you'll see what I mean.
It's such an obvious difference, once you've gained a bit if experience with a mirror.

I use this technique on fast, narrow climbs with sparse traffic when the sightlines are good.

In heavier traffic or around blind corners or hill crests, it can't be relied on.
f4rrest is offline