Originally Posted by
Machka
If you read my posts, I did not do that.
I am questioning the assumptions you made
after that.
But you know that. You're just being deliberately obtuse because you have no evidence to back up your assumptions, and you're having trouble admitting it.
What is 'evidence'-based extrapolation? You question the extrapolation, but you post no reasoning about why. You are just using posturing to imply there is some way to prove an extrapolation and I've failed to do that, therefore my whole point is null and void.
It's all implications. You haven't explained your logic in the least. When pressed you make references to things like searching for articles, etc. I don't know if you're even actually capable of making a direct argument without deferring to other authorities and sources, like publications.