Steve,

The point of a recall is to address products that are "at risk". Adding to the "at risk" pool after a known failure compromises the whole point of a recall.

Let me clarify....It is improper to issue a recall for 100 products ( out of a thousand at risk ) and add to the list as each of the at risk pool begins to fail.

I am not saying Tern did this, but I am suspicious after one customer claimed an ambiguity of their bike on Tern's site. Additionally the CPSC doesn't have a complete list of serial numbers, which is awkward.

Thanks,
Yan