Originally Posted by
dayco
It wouldn't have to be an either/or. Those who want to ride the roads, ride the roads. Those who want to ride the trails, ride the trails. Those who want to do both, do both......
correct. it wouldn't HAVE TO be an either/or.....until it is.
you can googles the attempts in various states to outright
ban bicycles from roadways outside of municipalities.
with dedicated bike paths across states, i can see an absolute
ban of bikes on roadways more easily achieved.
"
The ordinance says that when bicycle paths are provided, cyclists '
shall use such path and shall not use the public street.'"
"
under his proposed bill, “A bicyclist may not ride on a two-lane
highway outside the boundaries of a municipality when there is
no paved shoulder on which to ride."
remember...."when bikes are outlawed, only outlaws will have bikes!"