Originally Posted by
Abe_Froman
You're bringing up
a) an irrelevant question, and
b) something that is not testable
I could easily claim that every Tour de France in history was won by inferior riders on better bikes. It would be just as irrelevant and untestable.
The question is, what bikes are better? This is independent of the rider .
With all the talk of superior design and obsolete technology, wouldn't real world performance be both relevant and testable in the environment the bikes are designed for - that being road racing?