Old 09-25-17 | 10:37 AM
  #10  
Kevindale's Avatar
Kevindale
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
Likes: 46
From: Amsterdam

Bikes: 1980 Koga-Miyata Gentsluxe-S, 1998 Eddy Merckx Corsa 01, 1983 Tommasini Racing, 2012 Gulf Western CAAD10, 1980 Univega Gran Premio

Did some measuring with various wheels and tires. Bottom line is that folks are correct, the rear isn't going to take more than a true 25mm, while you have more room in the front and could easily get a 28mm tire there.

Front:
23mm Conti GP4000 II on Araya CTL-370, measuring an actual 23.5mm wide - a good 8mm clearance side to side, and plenty of room above.
25mm Conti GP4000II on Flo30 rim, measuring an actual 28.5mm wide - 5mm clearance side to side, and plenty of room above (brake caliper was within about 4 mm).

Rear:
23 mm Schwalbe Lugano on Ambrosio 19 Extra Super Elite, meas. actual 23mm - 7mm clearance to each chain stay, but maybe 3mm to brake bridge.
25mm Conti GP4000II on Araya CTL-370, measuring actual 26.5mm - 4-5mm to each chain stay, but just rubs on the brake bridge.

It appears to me that you could grind down the bottom of the brake bridge by a couple of mm without any worry, but that's not going to get you much. As I noted before, the same tire will have different widths and different heights with different rims, by as much as a couple of mm. And of course many tires don't measure as wide as they claim, and a few measure wider than they claim.

Bottom line - if you don't file the bottom of the brake bridge, you're stuck at a true 25mm tire in the rear, and even if you file it you aren't gaining much. I think the 650 conversion that's been suggested is the direction to go if you want some real width in the back. Since the front can handle a 28mm tire with no problem, I wonder if just doing the 650c conversion in the rear would be an inelegant but less expensive solution?
Kevindale is offline  
Reply