Originally Posted by
dh024
No time to carry on an argument with you, but let me summarize my initial point was that I merely suggested that people should CONSIDER going back to platforms for the benefits they might have for an INDIVIDUAL. We both have different experiences, so it is worthwhile CONSIDERING platforms. I'll NEVER go back to hard-soled, under-insulated, or expensive winter cycling boots (good luck finding one that solves all three problems), but I almost didn't try platforms again because so many people claim clipless is the ONLY way to go. Glad I didn't listen to that advice, and perhaps others may also.
Platforms and insulated boots is a cheaper option than cycling winter boots. Both 45Nrth and Lake now have winter biking boots that will address two of your concerns (proper insulation and walkability) but they aren't cheap. I bought a pair of 45Nrth Wolvhammer boots last year and they are comfortable and warm. They also include some grip areas for ice. But they were also over $200. Being able to clip in is worth it for me (but when temperatures drop to -20F I will still switch to platforms and ride with Neos overboots)
As for platform pedals, most people will indeed use the kind with pins rather than those Ergon pedals with 3M grip surfaces (it appears that Ergon no longer makes the pedals). I think that the grip surface may be an issue if you have to push through deep snow (but so can be clipless pedals) but that's just my assumption as I've never tried it.
If you do use pedals with pins, the pins will tear the sole of the boots faster than regular wear. So you won't get as many years out of them.
After 13 winters in Anchorage, AK I've learned that when it comes to winter biking "whatever works for you" is the best philosophy. What is perfect for you may be a complete disaster for me.