Originally Posted by
Doge
I didn't imply. I stated something I thought to be true. I was not sure. You said I was wrong, I did more research, I was correct.
To comment on benefit, it helps if you know the goal. He's done one race and crashed - maybe equipment based, and another race and didn't. It is all new, but the equipment is a big part of the fun, for both of us.
If the goal is to support the bike industry by buying parts, then keep at it. If the goal is for your son to perform on races, focus on technique is where he'll see benefits since he seems to already have fitness.
As for Shimano, I just reread your post. You said that SRAM's narrow wide patent is the reason why Shimano has an interest in pushing 2x and front derailleurs. The fact that Shimano has 1x drive trains makes it clear that SRAM's patent doesn't interfere with them. Nor does every other 1x ring maker going to pay SRAM licensing fees. So yes, you are wrong. And I have better things to do than argue with your arrogant ass.