View Single Post
Old 11-26-17 | 01:33 PM
  #15  
wahoonc's Avatar
wahoonc
Membership Not Required
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 16,853
Likes: 18
From: On the road-USA

Bikes: Giant Excursion, Raleigh Sports, Raleigh R.S.W. Compact, Motobecane? and about 20 more! OMG

Originally Posted by USAZorro
I consider tire-driven lighting to be more conversation piece than acceptable technology. I'd prefer something that wont get bent or damaged by a stick, or a minor mishap, and which won't wear down my tire and increase my risk of blowouts and premature replacement.

I can see using them for occasional, or emergency use, but I'd rather have a quality dyno-hub with lighting elements and patterns that do more than let me see what I'm going to inevitably crash into at the last moment. Battery-powered is also preferred, so long as it is functional and efficient.
Advantage to tire driven... it are cheap. I use it on couple of bikes for that very reason. Also in a few cases, they don't make a hub dyno that will fit the bike, or at least not easily. Also many of the better utility tires come with a dynamo track on them (thicker section on the sidewall). They have their place. I use battery lights as a source of last resort, but they have gotten better as the years have gone by.

Aaron
__________________
Webshots is bailing out, if you find any of my posts with corrupt picture files and want to see them corrected please let me know. :(

ISO: A late 1980's Giant Iguana MTB frameset (or complete bike) 23" Red with yellow graphics.

"Cycling should be a way of life, not a hobby.
RIDE, YOU FOOL, RIDE!"
_Nicodemus

"Steel: nearly a thousand years of metallurgical development
Aluminum: barely a hundred
Which one would you rather have under your butt at 30mph?"
_krazygluon
wahoonc is offline  
Reply