Old 11-29-17 | 02:49 PM
  #11  
davester's Avatar
davester
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 1,673
From: Berkeley CA

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 1975 Alex Singer, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International", 1985 Trek 720

Originally Posted by Andy_K
The other problem with using the same spoke length everywhere in the rear is that it puts an unnecessary wrinkle in the process of dishing the wheel. You're going to want to thread all the spokes in the same amount and then keep turning all the nipples by the same amount until you're ready to start actually truing and dishing. If you do this with spokes that are close to the correct length, the uneven lengths gets the dish headed in the right direction. If you use spokes that are slightly too long on one side and slightly too short on the other, you'll have to make extra turns on the long side to get the dish closer to correct. That's not a huge deal, since you have to get the dish right anyway, but you can either have the spoke length working for you or working against you. Given the choice, why not make things easier?
Another reason to go with different lengths is that on the back wheel it makes sense to go with sturdier, thicker spokes on the drive side and lighter on the non-drive side so as to decrease the tension asymmetry associated with a dished wheel. This means that you'll be ordering a different spoke type for the drive side anyway, so why not get a different length. There really is zero reason to use same length spokes for the rear as for the front.
davester is offline  
Reply