Old 11-30-17 | 04:52 AM
  #24  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

That looks like a nice stretch of road as long as you don't have to share it with cars and trucks. With high visibility clothes and flashing lights you can probably ride it safely 99% of the time, but 99% is not good enough. If traffic is fast and heavy and there's no room for error, errors are inevitable; and likely fatal to the cyclist. So I cannot recommend riding that road.

Bicycling is not dangerous: it's the cars that are dangerous. Cars are the problem, so it's ridiculous to suggest that the solution is adding another car to the mix.
I deeply resent the notion that to have good job you need car. Getting a cycle path added to that road is probably not a realistic option, but even so, you should probably speak to the planning commission or whoever's in charge of that sort of thing.

And then ride your bike on the longer route, hills be damned.
rhm is offline  
Reply