Thread: Re-raking fork
View Single Post
Old 12-12-17 | 11:34 PM
  #18  
79pmooney's Avatar
79pmooney
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
Likes: 5,273
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Originally Posted by Kontact
I'm not understanding your post. Trail is the product of rake and HTA. Regardless of HTA, if you use a rake that produces a certain trail, the bike will handle similarly in terms of what trail does.

23mm tires:
72.5° HTA + 48mm rake = 56mm trail
73.5° HTA + 42mm rake = 56mm trail

Both bikes will have very similar low and high speed handling because they have the same trail. Rake is the tool used to produce a particular trail given the need to vary HTA to produce different reach and wheelbases.
You are right about the math and probably about neutral trail bikes. I like less trail and I find that optimum trail varies with HTA. (Optimuim being the handling I like. Since I only spec forks and frames to be ridden my me, that is all that matters to me. I have ridden bikes from less than 72 to 75 HTA. The bikes with really sweet handling (in my book, I don't care about anybody else's) all fall on a diagonal line on a HTA-rake plot. The corresponding trails I believe also follow a line. I haven't plotted them; it may be a curve. It is not a constant trail.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply