View Single Post
Old 12-17-17 | 05:08 PM
  #37  
SethAZ's Avatar
SethAZ
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 334

Bikes: 2018 Lynskey R260, 2005 Diamondback 29er, 2003 Trek 2300

Originally Posted by MRT2
Should help a little. As I already said, I would actually look for a cassette without an 11 tooth cog which, IMO isn't really useful for a recreational cyclist using a triple. I have been using 12 - 25, and 12 - 27 cassettes for the last 5 years now and for flat to rolling hill terrain it works well for me.
100% agree. On my current and previous road bikes I eliminated the highest cog (12 to 13t on my previous 9-speed, and 11 to 12t on my current 11-speed) in favor of having an extra cog in the more useful part of the cassette's range.

With a 50t big ring up front at 13t I was spinning out at around 30-31mph (thats like 100-105rpm for me, which at my age and size counts as "spinning out"). With my current 12t highest gear and same front ring that now gets me to about 32mph or so. Since I only ever get this fast on a downhill, at most I lose out in a narrow range where my 11t groupmates are still pedaling like mad at 33 or 34mph and I've assumed my "escape velocity" tuck to just ride it out.

The OP did order a new cassette with a smaller low gear, which is useful, but it probably would have been even more useful to skip the 11t as well. His original gearings had those horrific 3t jumps between each gear, and even on a smaller middle ring than I'm used to that's still very disruptive. Getting to 1t and 2t shifts would help him out much more than preserving his top-end speed while bombing down a hill.
SethAZ is offline  
Reply