View Single Post
Old 12-28-17 | 02:59 PM
  #9  
merziac's Avatar
merziac
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,898
Likes: 9,277
From: PDX

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

You may not be wrong, much of it was certainly a slippery slope although Specialized by no means cornered the market on this sort of thing, they did however elevate it to an artform. The article notes that while suntour caved on STI shifters, Campy dug up drawings from the 50's of TA prototypes to invalidate Shimano's patent, which I would say was very fortunate for them.


Originally Posted by Spoonrobot
Just knowing the other business practices Specialized engaged in I wonder if this story has been embellished a bit to make it appear less reverse engineering and more Shimano trying to work with requests from a big-time purchaser. I mean we all know how the Stumpjumper came to be...
merziac is offline  
Reply