View Single Post
Old 01-06-18 | 09:31 AM
  #21  
DiegoFrogs's Avatar
DiegoFrogs
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 107
From: Scranton, PA, USA

Bikes: '77 Centurion "Pro Tour"; '67 Carlton "The Flyer"; 1984 Ross MTB (stored at parents' house)

Originally Posted by mboro1876
Nice idea. If you have a pic of your top part I’d love to see it. Indeed I have notches on the bottom part.
Not a problem.

IMG_2617.JPG

IMG_2618.JPG

IMG_2619.JPG

IMG_2620.JPG

I measured the top part's apparent thickness in the center, if looking from the front or rear of the bike, and I get about 9.0 mm. I just squeezed this region between the full blade length of my calipers. Of course the thing is highly sculpted on the underside, so it may be tough to make direct comparisons.

It seemed in looking at the 'bottom' part, that the sculpting allows the top to interface with the bottom piece, the special radiused top nut, and still do its job clamping the saddle rails. Unless Kalloy didn't innovate at all in the design, I suspect you'd need to use all three pieces together.

I became a bit curious after my first post, and was wondering if the radiused part of the post-attached aluminum that the bottom part slides on, with the notches, has the same radius. but when I took it apart, I found that it's not really an arc at all... I figure it makes 2 'line' contacts wherever you chose to position it, so it will probably interface with your 'bottom part' okay, even if they have different geometries.
DiegoFrogs is offline  
Reply