View Single Post
Old 01-17-18 | 12:37 PM
  #4  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
ThermionicScott
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,643
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Originally Posted by phtomita
I was trying to get more educated about the crank length and got to a video from GNC guys on Youtube.
From their formula, inseam x 1.25 + 65.
For short person like me, I get less than minimum 165 (Shimano crankset).

Does keeping as close as to this formula help to make biking more comfortable?
(= no knee, back, hip pain after long rides)

Anyone has experience getting improvement of riding experience when changing the crank length?

Thank you,
Paulo
Sugino makes a lot of their models (even the "modern" cranks) in shorter lengths like 160mm and the "Mighty Mignon" in lengths from 140-155mm.

If you go too short, you can get that "shoes tied together" feeling, but I think my knees do like 165mm more than 170mm. I'm 5'7"ish.

Whatever crank length you use, it's important to set the saddle height carefully. Going from a long crank to a shorter crank, you'll need to raise the saddle a little. And vice versa.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply