View Single Post
Old 01-17-18, 03:05 PM
  #71  
Kontact
Senior Member
 
Kontact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,250
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4525 Post(s)
Liked 1,668 Times in 1,093 Posts
Originally Posted by raria
I think that's where people will disagree with you.

All the endurance bikes put me upright and the ''proper" race bikes put me in a flat back position.

ROLObikes website puts it nicely

". As the ratio decreases, the reach increases relative to the stack so the rider becomes increasingly stretched out on the bike: the position is increasingly aggressive and aerodynamic. Conversely, as the ratio increases, the bike becomes more relaxed and the rider’s position is more upright."

As I've mentioned before and put a link in an earlier post in, the ratio of stack to reach varies from close to 1.6 for endurance bikes to close to 1.4 for race bikes.
Again, I would ask you to consult actual geometry charts instead of making blanket statements.

Are the following not pro racing bikes?

S-Works Roubaix McClaren - 1.6
Madone 9.9 - 1.54
Cervelo RCA - 1.5
Kontact is offline