View Single Post
Old 01-20-18, 07:39 PM
  #12  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times in 742 Posts
Originally Posted by Paravia
I owned a bike with a triple in the past, totally redundant just more weight to carry. I have the same ratios now (actually more) with a compact double, easier/quicker to use and to maintain, so I don't see the point of a triple.
If you were seriously considering an 11x42 cassette, then a triple combined with a more closely spaced cassette is anything but redundant.

The closer spacing of the two larger rings is a major plus as is the ability to have a very low low gear without going to a dinner plate size largest cog and the huge gearing gaps those cassettes provide.

The weight penalty of the triple is negligible, certainly no more than that of having a 42T cog.
HillRider is offline