Originally Posted by
tandempower
You assert this without mentioning any grounds for your lack of doubt. What is your faith based on? Blind faith?
No it is based on statements like this, from your Wikipedia link:
The rationale of the doctrine is that if ignorance were an excuse, a person charged with criminal offenses or a subject of a civil lawsuit would merely claim that one was unaware of the law in question to avoid liability, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignora...is_non_excusat
You can have the last word.