View Single Post
Old 02-12-18 | 08:41 PM
  #23  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Kontact

Geometry says this is an unworkable idea. It relies on you getting the fork so perfectly vertical that when you measure down to the table (which must be perfectly horizontal), ....
Table? What table? I guess my shorthand explanation was too shorthand, but I just re-explained it above.

It calls for a string and a ruler (for forks off the bike) and there's no triangulation. Just two easy length measurements, and a simple application of ratios, ie rake/axle to top = measured side/measured short section.

Feel free to knock it, but it might be fairer to actually understand or try it first.

BTW - as far as accuracy goes, it's an analog of the method that surveyors and others have used for well over a century to measure the heights of mtn peaks and buildings.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply