View Single Post
Old 03-04-18 | 11:32 PM
  #12  
79pmooney's Avatar
79pmooney
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,164
Likes: 5,295
From: Portland, OR

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

My issue with both 170 and 171 is that they both make assumptions: 170 that the fork axis is along the steerer axis. (I have heard it said that Peugeots of the day often ere built with forks that "trailed" a touch, ie where the fork axis was steeper than the steerer axis.) The 171 assumes the top tube is horizontal. On traditional bikes, usually, yes. But on a hastily jigged bike. maybe not.

I would prefer tools that give correct measurements without assuming good workmanship.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Reply