Originally Posted by jj1091

Let's say that someone's sitting there looking at their rim, they see an insert there, they've gone through lots of agony about what to do, they've asked a bunch of questions, and then they solve their own problem without assistance from the advice of others when they could have simply used trial and error, now they, publicly, want to be critical of other Forum members, The President of the United States, and a means of communication successfully used by hundreds of millions of people. Sorry, but I wouldn't take much stock in their opinion of what constitutes "quality or wisdom of content", especially when they found an answer which provided the data that they should have taken the time to look at the rim, first, instead of posing a problem that actually wasn't there. I wouldn't equate that with anything that related to wisdom, or quality, I'd equate it to laziness.

I used to know this co-worker that created problems, complained loudly to everyone who would listen what a horrible problem it was, and then magically became the one to solve them, therefore becoming the hero who could solve problems. I'd imagine that fietsbob's comment "could" be a method of pointing at "wisdom of content", in theoretically-posed problems such as this. My co-worker never saw the light either, he got fired.

However, I'm glad you got your problem worked out, the one with the rim. Sometimes odd discussions create determination....